Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:01:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:01:28 -0400 Received: from blackbird.intercode.com.au ([203.32.101.10]:50696 "EHLO blackbird.intercode.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:01:27 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 02:06:04 +1000 (EST) From: James Morris To: Linus Torvalds cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Performance issue in 2.5.32+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1201 Lines: 35 On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I don't really see anythign very suspicious in the 31->32 changelogs. > Somebody else already mentioned TLS etc, but that shouldn't really be > noticeable... I've now tracked the problem to the introduction of the new mtrr code, and backing it out for 2.5.32 restores original performance. From what I can tell, the new code is not handling a bios/hardware bug that the old code was. The old mtrr code says this during bootup: mtrr: your CPUs had inconsistent fixed MTRR settings mtrr: your CPUs had inconsistent variable MTRR settings mtrr: probably your BIOS does not setup all CPUs While the new code just says: mtrr: SMP support incomplete for this vendor The peformance hit is basically the same as when the old mtrr code is disabled. I'll have a poke around and see if I can find out why the new mtrr code isn't handling the problem. - James -- James Morris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/