MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20121103122157.GH8218@suse.de>
References: <20121025121617.617683848@chello.nl>
	<20121030122032.GC3888@suse.de>
	<CAGjg+kHrbjr8T0+TOEKp6Mx4zZBbrh_3VPUt81nWj6u3xi=NNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20121103122157.GH8218@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 10:47:41 +0800
Message-ID: <CAGjg+kHm=d6_pV29QgMP0H3Z3Tcahz8gi-rLVJpAqtF8jFPc-g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/31] numa/core patches
From: Alex Shi <lkml.alex@gmail.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>,
        "Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2224
Lines: 50

On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 07:04:04PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>> >
>> > In reality, this report is larger but I chopped it down a bit for
>> > brevity. autonuma beats schednuma *heavily* on this benchmark both in
>> > terms of average operations per numa node and overall throughput.
>> >
>> > SPECJBB PEAKS
>> >                                        3.7.0                      3.7.0                      3.7.0
>> >                               rc2-stats-v2r1         rc2-autonuma-v27r8         rc2-schednuma-v1r3
>> >  Expctd Warehouse                   12.00 (  0.00%)                   12.00 (  0.00%)                   12.00 (  0.00%)
>> >  Expctd Peak Bops               442225.00 (  0.00%)               596039.00 ( 34.78%)               555342.00 ( 25.58%)
>> >  Actual Warehouse                    7.00 (  0.00%)                    9.00 ( 28.57%)                    8.00 ( 14.29%)
>> >  Actual Peak Bops               550747.00 (  0.00%)               646124.00 ( 17.32%)               560635.00 (  1.80%)
>>
>> It is impressive report!
>>
>> Could you like to share the what JVM and options are you using in the
>> testing, and based on which kinds of platform?
>>
>
> Oracle JVM version "1.7.0_07"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_07-b10)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.3-b01, mixed mode)
>
> 4 JVMs were run, one for each node.
>
> JVM switch specified was -Xmx12901m so it would consume roughly 80% of
> memory overall.
>
> Machine is x86-64 4-node, 64G of RAM, CPUs are E7-4807, 48 cores in
> total with HT enabled.
>

Thanks for configuration sharing!

I used Jrockit and openjdk with Hugepage plus pin JVM to cpu socket.
In previous sched numa version, I had found 20% dropping with Jrockit
with our configuration. but for this version. No clear regression
found. also has no benefit found.

Seems we need to expend the testing configurations. :)
-- 
Thanks
    Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/