Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752883Ab2KKWN6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:13:58 -0500 Received: from oproxy6-pub.bluehost.com ([67.222.54.6]:53515 "HELO oproxy6-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752216Ab2KKWN4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:13:56 -0500 Reply-To: From: "Lawrence Rosen" To: , , Cc: , "Richard Fontana" , "Marc Fleischmann" , "Nicholas Bellinger" , , , , , References: <509A915B.30105@redhat.com> <509B117A.6070708@genband.com> <509BE460.6010404@redhat.com> <1352405111.29589.476.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <509C22B2.8010600@redhat.com> <1352426896.29589.512.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <20121109110336.41833034@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20121109110336.41833034@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> Subject: RE: scsi target, likely GPL violation Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 14:13:53 -0800 Organization: Rosenlaw & Einschlag Message-ID: <14c701cdc059$d6fd28b0$84f77a10$@rosenlaw.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQKiWmEupwXV+Zk7MhVwjar7imSUzQEl4rhnAfQMYuUCpeHO3AFABWG+AuJEEqgCkJrOLAJsiqlWlcUC9LA= Content-Language: en-us X-Identified-User: {1397:box597.bluehost.com:rosenla1:rosenlaw.com} {sentby:smtp auth 70.36.224.178 authed with lrosen@rosenlaw.com} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3123 Lines: 68 Alan Cox wrote: > So either your work is truely not derivative of the kernel (which I find > wildly improbable) or you have a problem and since you are aware > of the complaints publically I guess probably a triple damages sized > problem. But that's one for your lawyers and whatever opinion they > have on the subject. Hi Alan and others, I've been advising Rising Tide Systems (RTS) in this matter. Please let me reassure you that RTS is acting on advice of counsel. RTS (and specifically Nicholas Bellinger) wrote the scsi target code and owns its copyright. We registered that copyright at the Library of Congress. RTS contributed a version of the scsi target to Linux for distribution under the GPL. On behalf of Marc Fleischmann, CEO of RTS, I can reassure you that RTS remains committed to the Linux project and will continue to contribute to it. We are pleased that RTS software is a part of the Linux distribution under the GPL. RTS also has a commercial software business. It distributes versions of its scsi target code that support features and functions not officially in Linux (or at least, not yet). That commercial RTS business includes the licensing of those derivative works of its own code to its own customers. Nothing whatsoever in the GPL or in the policies of the Linux Foundation prohibits that. I would also like to address some comments made on these lists by Andy Grover and Bradley Kuhn. First, I hope that we can tone down the arguments about whether the use of Linux APIs and headers automatically turns a program into a derivative work of Linux. I think that argument has been largely debunked in the U.S. in the recent decision in Oracle v. Google, and in Europe in SAS v. World Programming. Does anyone here question whether the original work that RTS contributed to Linux (and that *is* under the GPL) is an original work of authorship of RTS despite the fact that it links to other GPL code using headers and APIs? Second, we are grateful for the efforts that Bradley Kuhn and others put in to enforce the GPL. As I said above, RTS owns and has registered the copyright on its scsi target and will enforce it if necessary. So Brad, we may solicit your assistance if we find any third party who is distributing an unauthorized non-GPL derivative work of the scsi target now in Linux. RTS, of course, retains the exclusive right to do so, but no third party can do so without a license from RTS. Best regards, /Larry P.S. In accordance with my obligations as an attorney when communicating with a represented person, I am copying attorneys for Red Hat and Linux Foundation on this email. If anyone wishes to respond to me, please copy me directly since I am not subscribed to these lists. Lawrence Rosen Rosenlaw & Einschlag, a technology law firm (www.rosenlaw.com) 3001 King Ranch Rd., Ukiah, CA 95482 Office: 707-485-1242 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/