Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751896Ab2KLH5S (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2012 02:57:18 -0500 Received: from mail.parknet.co.jp ([210.171.160.6]:59488 "EHLO mail.parknet.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750984Ab2KLH5R (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2012 02:57:17 -0500 From: OGAWA Hirofumi To: Namjae Jeon Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Amit Sahrawat Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fat: fix time updates for create and delete References: <1352642278-2730-1-git-send-email-linkinjeon@gmail.com> <874nkw86jz.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:57:13 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Namjae Jeon's message of "Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:37:20 +0900") Message-ID: <87sj8f5k4m.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1029 Lines: 26 Namjae Jeon writes: > 2012/11/12, OGAWA Hirofumi : >> Namjae Jeon writes: >> >>> Correctly update modification and status change time in case of >>> file/directory removal and creation. >> >> This changelog just explain "what", and it doesn't explain "why". Please >> explain why we need this change. >> >> IIRC, timestamp handling in FAT driver is strange historically. Anyway, >> FAT doesn't have "inode change time". It is "creation time" in FAT. > Hi. OGAWA. > I made this patch after comparing timestamp handlings with MSDOS and XFS. > Should timestamp handling of FAT be same with MSDOS ? > Am I missing ? What was difference with XFS, FAT, and MSDOS? -- OGAWA Hirofumi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/