Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752538Ab2KLJVJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2012 04:21:09 -0500 Received: from mail.parknet.co.jp ([210.171.160.6]:59523 "EHLO mail.parknet.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751936Ab2KLJVH (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2012 04:21:07 -0500 From: OGAWA Hirofumi To: Namjae Jeon Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Amit Sahrawat Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fat: fix time updates for create and delete References: <1352642278-2730-1-git-send-email-linkinjeon@gmail.com> <874nkw86jz.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <87sj8f5k4m.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <87obj35k3a.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:21:04 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Namjae Jeon's message of "Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:12:39 +0900") Message-ID: <87k3tr5g8v.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 888 Lines: 20 Namjae Jeon writes: >>> What was difference with XFS, FAT, and MSDOS? > Okay, the description of patch was lacked, So I will resend patch with > specifical test reseult with other filesystem. >> >> BTW, I recall I checked this, and yes, it is strange. But it is historical. > "historical" means It is difficult to change ? The timestamp handling was not same with unix fs from initial, and FAT doesn't have inode change timestamp. This historical reason it is not better to change to same with unix fs, and never be possible to support inode change timestamp cleanly. -- OGAWA Hirofumi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/