Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 14:59:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 14:59:38 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:37015 "HELO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 14:59:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 21:08:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Ingo Molnar Reply-To: Ingo Molnar To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: do_syslog/__down_trylock lockup in current BK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1400 Lines: 39 On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > >>EIP; c0106c57 <__down_trylock+a7/b4> <===== > > Are you sure your system.map is correct? __down_trylock() should _not_ be > that big - it's just 67 bytes for me (and apparently almost three times > the size for you). Spinlock debugging or something? i have spinlock debugging enabled - but indeed the trace could be incorrect, let me re-check it. doh, wrong script called ... the right backtrace is: >>EIP; c0106c57 <__write_lock_failed+7/20> <===== Trace; c0120316 <.text.lock.exit+119/133> Trace; c01088c8 Trace; c011ef16 Trace; c011f41a Trace; c0125755 Trace; c0126686 Trace; c0127c54 Trace; c0107cf3 Trace; c012d572 Trace; c0107fce (we definitely need kksymoops in the 2.5 kernel - it's just *so* much easier to debug various crashes with kksymoops enabled - especially when debugging over a serial line.) and this lockup definitely looks related to the signal changes. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/