Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:14:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:14:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:60568 "HELO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:14:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 21:23:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Ingo Molnar Reply-To: Ingo Molnar To: Zwane Mwaikambo Cc: Linus Torvalds , Robert Love , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] per isr in_progress markers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 928 Lines: 22 On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > As an aside, i just had an idea for another way to improve interrupt > handling latency. Instead of walking through all the isrs in the chain, > we can have an isr flag wether it was the source of the irq, and if so > we stop right there and not walk through the other isrs. Obviously > taking into account that some devices are dumb and have no real way of > determining. this is something i have a 0.5 MB patch for that touches a few hundred drivers. I can dust it off if there's demand - it will break almost nothing because i've done the hard work of adding the default 'no work was done' bit to every driver's IRQ handler. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/