Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754090Ab2KLXyT (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:54:19 -0500 Received: from e37.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.158]:48941 "EHLO e37.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753158Ab2KLXyS (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:54:18 -0500 Message-ID: <50A18C0F.9000604@us.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:53:51 -0800 From: John Stultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Henningsson CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, "Rostedt, Steven" Subject: Re: getnstimeofday stuck for several milliseconds? References: <50977DF5.60703@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: <50977DF5.60703@canonical.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 12111223-7408-0000-0000-00000A31C5D1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3024 Lines: 74 On 11/05/2012 12:51 AM, David Henningsson wrote: > Hi LKML, > > I'm trying to make audio more useful in everyday low-latency scenarios > such as gaming or VOIP. > > While doing so, I ran the wakeup_rt tracer, to track the time from > PulseAudio requesting wakeup (through hrtimers), to the thread > actually running. > > I'm not sure how much overhead added by the wakeup_rt tracer itself, > but I got 9 ms on one machine and 20 ms on another, which I consider > to be quite a lot even for a standard kernel (i e without RT or other > special configuration). > > The 9 ms example is pastebinned at [1], and here's where we get stuck > for most of the time: > > -0 3d... 1105us : ktime_get_real <-intel_idle > -0 3d... 1106us!: getnstimeofday <-ktime_get_real > -0 3d... 7823us : ktime_get_real <-intel_idle > > -0 3d... 7890us : ktime_get_real <-intel_idle > -0 3d... 7891us!: getnstimeofday <-ktime_get_real > -0 3d... 9023us : ktime_get_real <-intel_idle > Its been awhile since I looked at wakeup_rt trace output, but that looks more like ~6.7ms and ~1.2ms latencies, not 9ms (are you adding these together?). > It seems to me that sometimes we get stuck for several milliseconds > inside the getnstimeofday function - this was seen on both the 9 ms > and the 20 ms trace. This looks like a bug to me, and as I'm not sure > on how to best debug it further, and therefore I'm asking for help (or > a bug fix!) here. > > For reference, the 9 ms trace was from a ~2 year old laptop (core i3 > cpu) running 3.7rc2 vanilla/mainline kernel, and the 20 ms trace was > from an ~1 year old Atom-based machine running the 3.2-ubuntu kernel. > While tracing was enabled, I was running a libSDL game for a minute or > two. > > Thanks in advance for looking into this, and let me know if you need > further information, or anything else I can do to help sorting this > one out. Hrmm.. So 6.7ms is still a long time. Looking at the trace you posted here: http://pastebin.se/6iMRdDfR The trace also looks like its the cpuidle to interrupt transition where you're seeing this. I sort of wonder if its mis-attributing the idle time to the getnstimeofday()? Mainly because you don't seem to spend much time in intel_idle() otherwise. Or maybe we're both misreading it and its saying there's a delay between the first ktime_get_real() from intel_idle() to the second call of ktime_get_real(), between which we're in deep idle (which would make sense)? Because unless the timekeeping lock is getting held for a long time, I don't know why else you'd see such long delays at getnstimeofday(). Cc'ing Steven to see if he can't help understand whats going on here. thanks -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/