Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 17:04:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 17:04:52 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust128.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.128]:6128 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 17:04:48 -0400 Subject: Re: LMbench2.0 results From: Alan Cox To: Daniel Phillips Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , Rik van Riel , Andrew Morton , Paolo Ciarrocchi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <312431072.1031563589@[10.10.2.3]> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-6) Date: 09 Sep 2002 22:11:58 +0100 Message-Id: <1031605918.29792.55.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 842 Lines: 16 On Mon, 2002-09-09 at 17:55, Daniel Phillips wrote: > You need to look at it from the other direction: how do the needs of a > uniprocessor Clawhammer box differ from a Linksys adsl router? I've advocated several times having a single config option for "fine tuning" that sane people say "N" to and which if set lets you force small hash sizes, disable block layer support and kill various other 'always needed' PC crap. Tell me - on a 4Mb embedded 386 running your toaster do you really care if the TCP hash lookup is a little slower than perfect scaling, and do you need a 64Kbyte mount hash ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/