Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755334Ab2KMRIb (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:08:31 -0500 Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.159]:55946 "EHLO e38.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752005Ab2KMRI3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:08:29 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 09:08:04 -0800 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Nick Bowler Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, sbw@mit.edu, patches@linaro.org Subject: Re: Does anyone use CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU? Message-ID: <20121113170804.GA2489@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20121113004906.GA10557@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20121113144620.GA27426@elliptictech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121113144620.GA27426@elliptictech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 12111317-5518-0000-0000-00000940500C Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1066 Lines: 26 On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 09:46:20AM -0500, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2012-11-12 16:49 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I know of people using TINY_RCU, TREE_RCU, and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU, but I > > have not heard of anyone using TINY_PREEMPT_RCU for whom TREE_PREEMPT_RCU > > was not a viable option (in contrast, the people running Linux on > > tiny-memmory systems typically use TINY_RCU). Of course, if no one > > really needs it, the proper thing to do is to remove it. > > > > So, if you need TINY_PREEMPT_RCU, please let me know. Otherwise, I will > > remove it, probably in the 3.9 timeframe. > > Yes, I use TINY_PREEMPT_RCU on my UP machines. It is, in fact, the only > option. Suppose that TREE_PREEMPT_RCU was available for !SMP && PREEMPT builds. Would that work for you? Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/