Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755859Ab2KMU3u (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:29:50 -0500 Received: from lvps176-28-13-145.dedicated.hosteurope.de ([176.28.13.145]:51577 "EHLO lvps176-28-13-145.dedicated.hosteurope.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755704Ab2KMU3r (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:29:47 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 446 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:29:47 EST From: Tim Sander Organization: Sander & Lighting To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: Does anyone use CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU? Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:22:29 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.7.0-rc4-00136-gaffd9a8; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, sbw@mit.edu, patches@linaro.org References: <20121113004906.GA10557@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20121113004906.GA10557@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201211132122.30259.tim01@vlsi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 948 Lines: 20 Hi Paul > I know of people using TINY_RCU, TREE_RCU, and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU, but I > have not heard of anyone using TINY_PREEMPT_RCU for whom TREE_PREEMPT_RCU > was not a viable option (in contrast, the people running Linux on > tiny-memmory systems typically use TINY_RCU). Of course, if no one > really needs it, the proper thing to do is to remove it. > > So, if you need TINY_PREEMPT_RCU, please let me know. Otherwise, I will > remove it, probably in the 3.9 timeframe. I am using TINY_PREEMPT_RCU on the i.mx35 platform. I am currently on 3.4-rt since the 3.6 compile failed due to for my config? Some strange device tree stuff which i haven't had the time to figure out why. Best regards Tim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/