Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 18:33:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 18:33:02 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:4458 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 18:32:05 -0400 From: Alan Cox Message-Id: <200209092236.g89MamX04399@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Subject: Re: 2.4.20-pre5-ac4 hda lost interrupt To: ken@kenmoffat.uklinux.net (Ken Moffat) Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 18:36:48 -0400 (EDT) Cc: alan@redhat.com (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (lkml) In-Reply-To: from "Ken Moffat" at Sep 09, 2002 10:59:49 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 523 Lines: 11 Thats a known problem with the new code. We decide how to handle simplex devices before we actually get around to checking if there are drives on it. As a result we disable DMA on them all. The timeout is interesting in itself. Does it go away if you disable IDE taskfile I/O ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/