Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 02:21:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 02:21:41 -0400 Received: from imo-r10.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.106]:31463 "EHLO imo-r10.mx.aol.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 02:21:40 -0400 Message-ID: <3D7D8FF4.5050106@netscape.net> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 16:23:48 +1000 From: Wade User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0+) Gecko/20020518 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: XFS? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1056 Lines: 33 In the long run, for sure. I'm not saying Linus needs to be replaced, but his _manners_ could do with some work. Those XFS guys have worked quite hard to make the merge fairly painless, and Linus wont even comment (that I've seen, see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103118187002156&w=2). BTW: I'm only a lurker, I don't even use XFS :-) [ _XXX_ is (C) 2002 Linus Torvalds. ] Rik van Riel wrote: > On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Wade wrote: > > >>I've noticed this too. And I must say, ITS QUITE FUCKING RUDE OF LINUS. > > > If you think you can do things better you should fork Wadix ;) > > Linus might not be the easiest user interface and I've had some > problems too in the past, but everybody will have to admit that > the current system just works in the long run. > > cheers, > > Rik - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/