Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933173Ab2KNWQ1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:16:27 -0500 Received: from mx.scalarmail.ca ([98.158.95.75]:41322 "EHLO ironport-01.sms.scalar.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933152Ab2KNWQ0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:16:26 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:15:44 -0500 From: Nick Bowler To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] scatterlist: don't BUG when we can trivially return a proper error. Message-ID: <20121114221544.GA3083@elliptictech.com> References: <1351796580-20600-1-git-send-email-nbowler@elliptictech.com> <20121114130500.250dd5b8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121114130500.250dd5b8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Organization: Elliptic Technologies Inc. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1495 Lines: 43 On 2012-11-14 13:05 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 15:03:00 -0400 > Nick Bowler wrote: > > > There is absolutely no reason to crash the kernel when we have a > > perfectly good return value already available to use for conveying > > failure status. > > Yes, I suppose that's true. I don't see a case for BUGging the kernel > here. [...] > > - BUG_ON(nents > max_ents); > > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(nents > max_ents)) > > + return -E2BIG; > > #endif > > OK, pet peeve: if this E2BIG gets returned to userspace, our poor user > will look it up and see "Argument list too long; used when the > arguments passed to a new program being executed with one of the exec > functions occupy too much memory space". He then gets to spend half a > day reviewing his code's exec() callsites! > > See? Although the error's name sounds like a nice match to the > internal state, it isn't really a match at all and our use of it is > misleading. > > Unfortunately there is no EKERNELSCREWEDUP, Well, maybe we should add it! :P > so we usually use EINVAL. Fair enough. I will prepare v2. But perhaps EOPNOTSUPP would be a better fit? Thanks, -- Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/