Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423533Ab2KNW0f (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:26:35 -0500 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]:45977 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423518Ab2KNW0e (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:26:34 -0500 Message-ID: <50A41A85.9090800@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:26:13 -0800 From: John Stultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Rostedt CC: Peter Zijlstra , Stephane Eranian , LKML , "mingo@elte.hu" , Paul Mackerras , Anton Blanchard , Will Deacon , "ak@linux.intel.com" , Pekka Enberg , Robert Richter , tglx Subject: Re: [RFC] perf: need to expose sched_clock to correlate user samples with kernel samples References: <1350408232.2336.42.camel@laptop> <509DB632.7070305@linaro.org> <1352840337.18025.43.camel@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <1352840337.18025.43.camel@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 12111422-5112-0000-0000-00000E92A079 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2287 Lines: 49 On 11/13/2012 12:58 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 18:04 -0800, John Stultz wrote: >> On 10/16/2012 10:23 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> I've no problem with adding CLOCK_PERF (or another/better name). >> Hrm. I'm not excited about exporting that sort of internal kernel >> details to userland. >> >> The behavior and expectations from sched_clock() has changed over the >> years, so I'm not sure its wise to export it, since we'd have to >> preserve its behavior from then on. >> >> Also I worry that it will be abused in the same way that direct TSC >> access is, where the seemingly better performance from the more >> careful/correct CLOCK_MONOTONIC would cause developers to write fragile >> userland code that will break when moved from one machine to the next. >> >> I'd probably rather perf output timestamps to userland using sane clocks >> (CLOCK_MONOTONIC), rather then trying to introduce a new time domain to >> userland. But I probably could be convinced I'm wrong. > I'm surprised that perf has its own clock anyway. But I would like to > export the tracing clocks. We have three (well four) of them: > > trace_clock_local() which is defined to be a very fast clock but may not > be synced with other cpus (basically, it just calls sched_clock). > > trace_clock() which is not totally serialized, but also not totally off > (between local and global). This uses local_clock() which is the same > thing that perf_clock() uses. > > trace_clock_global() which is a monotonic clock across CPUs. It's much > slower than the above, but works well when you require synced > timestamps. > > There's also trace_clock_counter() which isn't even a clock :-) It's > just a incremental atomic counter that goes up every time it's called. > This is the most synced clock, but is absolutely meaningless for > timestamps. It's just a way to show ordered events. Oof. This is getting uglier. I'd really prefer not to expose all these different internal clocks out userland. Especially via clock_gettime(). thanks -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/