Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 06:35:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 06:35:25 -0400 Received: from hermine.idb.hist.no ([158.38.50.15]:10256 "HELO hermine.idb.hist.no") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 06:35:24 -0400 Message-ID: <3D7DCC6D.4153691E@aitel.hist.no> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 12:41:49 +0200 From: Helge Hafting X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [no] (X11; U; Linux 2.5.33 i686) X-Accept-Language: no, en, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomas Szepe CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BK] PATCH ReiserFS 1 of 3 RESEND References: <20020909113147.BBA73A7CDF@reload.namesys.com> <20020909154849.GJ26075@louise.pinerecords.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 965 Lines: 22 Tomas Szepe wrote: > > > (Yes, I realize that both addresses likely work perfectly fine, and that > > "reload" is the machine you actually use for sending the email, but > > still.. I bet I'm not the only one who uses spam filtering software that > > cares about issues like this.) > > Linus, if your spam filtering software considers a post with a unidiff > inside it spam, it's apparently not too terrific. A good point today, but dangerous. If "unidiff makes it ok" becomes mainstream (i.e. some distro packages that sort of antispam sw) then spammers surely will append a real small unidiff to their messages. Today they put extra letters in the subject, fooling yesterday's spam detectors. . . Helge Hafting - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/