Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 06:43:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 06:43:17 -0400 Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.17]:13516 "EHLO mailout02.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 06:43:16 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 12:30:47 +0200 From: Heinz.Mauelshagen@t-online.de (Heinz J . Mauelshagen) To: Lars Marowsky-Bree Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mge@sistina.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Multi-path IO in 2.5/2.6 ? Message-ID: <20020910123047.A21509@sistina.com> Reply-To: mauelshagen@sistina.com References: <20020909104944.GH27887@marowsky-bree.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20020909104944.GH27887@marowsky-bree.de>; from lmb@suse.de on Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 12:49:44PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2467 Lines: 65 On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 12:49:44PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > Morning everyone, > > I hope people are waking up by now ;-) > > So, what is the take on "multi-path IO" (in particular, storage) in 2.5/2.6? > > Right now, we have md multipathing in 2.4 (+ an enhancement to that one by > Jens Axboe and myself, which however was ignored on l-k ;-), an enhancement to > LVM1 and various hardware-specific and thus obviously wrong approaches. > > I am looking at what to do for 2.5. I have considered porting the small > changes from 2.4 to md 2.5. The LVM1 changes are probably and out gone, as > LVM1 doesn't work still. > > I noticed that EVMS duplicates the entire md layer internally (great way to > code, really!), so that might also require changing if I update the md code. > > Or can the LVM2 device-mapper be used to do that more cleanly? We have a multi-path target for device-mapper planned for later this year. This will be a multi-path addon to the generic mapping service(s) device-mapper already provides which can multi-path access to any arbitrary given block device, not just logical volumes. > > I wonder whether anyone has given this some thought already. We did ;) > > > Sincerely, > Lars Marowsky-Br?e > > -- > Immortality is an adequate definition of high availability for me. > --- Gregory F. Pfister > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Regards, Heinz -- The LVM Guy -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc. Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11 56242 Marienrachdorf Germany Mauelshagen@Sistina.com +49 2626 141200 FAX 924446 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/