Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:02:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:02:40 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:18950 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:02:14 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 16:07:00 +0200 From: Dave Jones To: Hans Reiser Cc: marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, green@namesys.com Subject: Re: [BK] ReiserFS changesets for 2.4 (performs writes more than 4k at a time) Message-ID: <20020910160659.A15158@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Hans Reiser , marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, green@namesys.com References: <3D7DF05E.7030903@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3D7DF05E.7030903@namesys.com>; from reiser@namesys.com on Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 05:15:10PM +0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 754 Lines: 20 On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 05:15:10PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote: > It passes all of our testing, but it is the kind of code that is more > likely than most to have elusive lurking bugs. It cannot be tested in > 2.5 first because 2.5 is too broken at this particular moment. What in particular holds you back from testing this in 2.5 ? This seems quite dubious for inclusion first in what it supposed to be the stable series. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/