Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1768743Ab2KOTLS (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:11:18 -0500 Received: from nm30-vm0.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.44.194]:24900 "EHLO nm30-vm0.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1768590Ab2KOTLP (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:11:15 -0500 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 384328.47798.bm@smtp111.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: tWRvIToVM1lSlNSFp5p.vWvokMETHCXEhosEWX3XH8JVJZD vg1XyV8VaCK5l5Qqooyd8FS02l4zN_xYIGBln_w4fEDF_XwZXSBxoxLkPaV_ MH3TCgnCXKN9K49.HD8Y6h09CpM2Wd4EDnqN_KLXoH.F..TGY4VNGIvUtN.8 cXgdHr3KeyUTzVzFv9URaYQLzqhRyGywQCY8lNdbXGTKrDi4RPrybRgYH10o tTS_VNUelx..YnhyryZGCQYPo7DL06tA19xzsdN7PvH.HuUM0IxKrgaB83Gh kX3A5FsGUsEGh4VAsQVvwFKXljVcHeeTEHasOtB5wrFl1Wx1InaHPYHq54op HCkFG9hNC2tp7OepsKtAVh4wWh8uKbXx6kCmUi69_B_FXMAzAe82qcobqCSJ gyDj6zEyMIcQSqg2e4d7VGARt_gADT6cWKyJr1AOB6xfR43zRe3t63g4_GZ4 HHxYYf9vXBP.kvvUZ.tPcQu7NOQ-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: xXkkXk6swBBAi.5wfkIWFW3ugxbrqyhyk_b4Z25Sfu.XGQ-- Message-ID: <50A53E53.8080404@att.net> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:11:15 -0600 From: Daniel Santos Reply-To: Daniel Santos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120502 Thunderbird/10.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Borislav Petkov CC: LKML , Andi Kleen , Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , Christopher Li , David Daney , David Howells , Joe Perches , Josh Triplett , Konstantin Khlebnikov , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Michel Lespinasse , Paul Gortmaker , Pavel Pisa , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] bug.h: Prevent double evaulation of in BUILD_BUG_ON References: <1352844568-18826-1-git-send-email-daniel.santos@pobox.com> <1352844821-18952-6-git-send-email-daniel.santos@pobox.com> <20121115150726.GD4956@x1.osrc.amd.com> In-Reply-To: <20121115150726.GD4956@x1.osrc.amd.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1894 Lines: 45 On 11/15/2012 09:07 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:13:38PM -0600, danielfsantos@att.net wrote: >> When calling BUILD_BUG_ON in an optimized build using gcc 4.3 and later, >> the condition will be evaulated twice, possibily with side-effects. >> This patch eliminates that error. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Santos >> --- >> include/linux/bug.h | 5 +++-- >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/bug.h b/include/linux/bug.h >> index 1b2465d..ccd44ce 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/bug.h >> +++ b/include/linux/bug.h >> @@ -58,8 +58,9 @@ struct pt_regs; >> extern int __build_bug_on_failed; >> #define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) \ >> do { \ >> - ((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2*!!(condition)])); \ >> - if (condition) __build_bug_on_failed = 1; \ >> + bool __cond = !!(condition); \ >> + ((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2*!!(__cond)])); \ > No need for the !!(__cond) here because you've done it in the line > above. IOW, > > bool __cond = !!(condition); > ((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2 * __cond])); > > which is even a bit more readable, as a matter of fact. Ah yes. I did notice that at one point, but I think it slipped my mind. Also, the kernel has introduced me to the usage of the !! construct, of which I'm well versed in its affects in various situations and how gcc's optimizer ends up treating its usage, so probably another reason I didn't change it immediately. But it's basically shorthand for the expression (condition ? 1 : 0), correct? Or are there other details in the C standard that makes it different in some cases? Thanks, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/