Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S319150AbSIJQEO>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 12:04:14 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S319151AbSIJQEO>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 12:04:14 -0400
Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust128.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.128]:751 "EHLO
	irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S319150AbSIJQEN>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 12:04:13 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC] Multi-path IO in 2.5/2.6 ? [OFF TOPIC]
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Ben Rafanello <benr@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lmb@suse.de
In-Reply-To: <OFD26579C4.CE195ECA-ON85256C2F.005426A9@pok.ibm.com>
References: <OFD26579C4.CE195ECA-ON85256C2F.005426A9@pok.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-6) 
Date: 10 Sep 2002 17:12:03 +0100
Message-Id: <1031674323.31787.100.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 683
Lines: 16

On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 16:59, Ben Rafanello wrote:
> It seems that nobody understands why EVMS was designed and coded
> the way it was, so perhaps this is a good time to explain what
> drove us in the direction we went.

I'm looking at things purely from a where are we now, how do we get XYZ
feature viewpoint. We have some history in the kernel and its a pain t
deal with before we import history that isnt needed from another
project.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/