Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751365Ab2KPBN4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:13:56 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:53453 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751146Ab2KPBNy (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:13:54 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,259,1352102400"; d="scan'208";a="242972593" Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:13:53 -0700 From: Jon Mason To: Greg KH Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Dave Jiang , Nicholas Bellinger Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] net: Add support for NTB virtual ethernet device Message-ID: <20121116011353.GK24723@jonmason-lab> References: <1352160669-4330-1-git-send-email-jon.mason@intel.com> <1352160669-4330-3-git-send-email-jon.mason@intel.com> <20121116003043.GC20876@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121116003043.GC20876@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1377 Lines: 38 On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 04:30:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:11:09PM -0700, Jon Mason wrote: > > A virtual ethernet device that uses the NTB transport API to > > send/receive data. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jon Mason > > Reviewed-by: Nicholas Bellinger > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > drivers/net/Kconfig | 4 + > > drivers/net/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/net/ntb_netdev.c | 415 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > As I haven't taken the core yet, I can't take this. But even then, I > would need an ack from the network maintainers before I could. I have been Cc'ing netdev on these patches and gotten many good comments, but I can cc Dave Miller explicitly on my next version (as there will obviously need to be one based on your comments on the previous patch). > > And are you sure this is in the correct location in the tree? I assumed that the virtual network client that uses NTB as a transport would best fit in the network drivers. Is this a bad assumption? Thanks, Jon > > thanks, > > greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/