Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751310Ab2KPCuz (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:50:55 -0500 Received: from e23smtp07.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.140]:40058 "EHLO e23smtp07.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751169Ab2KPCuy (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:50:54 -0500 Message-ID: <50A5AA03.2000707@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:50:43 +0800 From: Michael Wang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kara CC: =?UTF-8?B?UGF3ZcWCIFNpa29yYQ==?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, arekm@pld-linux.org, baggins@pld-linux.org, Alexander Viro , Fengguang Wu , Johannes Weiner , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [3.6.6] panic on reboot / khungtaskd blocked? (WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:123 native_smp_send_reschedule) References: <56378024.A3Kec8xZj0@pawels> <2413953.H7iie8v1th@pawels> <50A302C9.2060800@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1984533.1jAeFKDqSR@localhost> <50A44854.6040905@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20121115094046.GD1394@quack.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20121115094046.GD1394@quack.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit x-cbid: 12111602-0260-0000-0000-0000022967CB Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3498 Lines: 81 On 11/15/2012 05:40 PM, Jan Kara wrote: > On Thu 15-11-12 09:41:40, Michael Wang wrote: >> On 11/15/2012 05:10 AM, Paweł Sikora wrote: >>> On Wednesday 14 of November 2012 10:32:41 Michael Wang wrote: >>>> On 11/13/2012 05:40 PM, Paweł Sikora wrote: >>>>> On Monday 12 of November 2012 13:33:39 Paweł Sikora wrote: >>>>>> On Monday 12 of November 2012 11:22:47 Paweł Sikora wrote: >>>>>>> On Monday 12 of November 2012 15:40:31 Michael Wang wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/12/2012 03:16 PM, Paweł Sikora wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Monday 12 of November 2012 11:04:12 Michael Wang wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/09/2012 09:48 PM, Paweł Sikora wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> during playing with new ups i've caught an nice oops on reboot: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://imgbin.org/index.php?page=image&id=10253 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> probably the upstream is also affected. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, Paweł >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Are you using a clean 3.6.6 without any modify? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> yes, pure 3.6.6 form git tree with modular config. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Looks like some threads has set itself to be UNINTERRUPTIBLE with out >>>>>>>>>> any design on switch itself back later(or the time is too long), are you >>>>>>>>>> accidentally using some bad designed module? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> hmm, hard to say. mostly all modules are loaded automatically by kernel. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Could you please provide the whole dmesg in text? your picture lost the >>>>>>>> print info of the hung task. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> i've grabbed the console via rs232 but there's no more info (see attached txt). >>>>>> >>>>>> hmm, i have one observation. >>>>>> >>>>>> during rc.shutdown there're messages on console like this: Cannot stat file /proc/$pid/fd/1: Connection timed out >>>>>> afaics this file descriptor points to vnc log file on a remote machine, e.g.: >>>>>> >>>>>> # ps aux|grep xfwm4 >>>>>> eda 1748 0.0 0.0 320220 11224 ? S 13:08 0:00 xfwm4 >>>>>> >>>>>> # readlink -m /proc/1748/fd/1 >>>>>> /remote/dragon/ahome/eda/.vnc/odra:11.log >>>>>> >>>>>> # mount|grep ahome >>>>>> dragon:/home/users/ on /remote/dragon/ahome type nfs (rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=262144,wsize=262144,namlen=255,soft,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=10.0.2.121,mountvers=3,mountport=45251,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=10.0.2.121) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> so, probably during `killall5 -TERM/-KILL` on shutdown stage something sometimes go wrong >>>>>> and these processes (xfce4/vncserver) survive the signal and hang on the nfs i/o. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ok, now i have full sysrq+w backtraces from shutdown process. i hope i'll help you. >>>> >>>> This can only tell us what's the task in UNINTERRUPTABLE state, but with >>>> out time info, we can't find out which one is the hung task... >> >> So it's blocked on __lock_page() for too long? >> Add more experts in mm aspect to cc. > It's really NFS related. E.g. in trace > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/14/657 we are waiting on PageWriteback bit > in fact - i.e. we have submitted data to the NFS server and are waiting for > its response that the data was written. Do you mean, NFS lock some page, then wait on a respond which not come in? Regards, Michael Wang > > Honza > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/