Message-ID: <50A6B0E6.2010608@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:32:22 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121029 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
CC: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, mchehab@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Wrong defaults in 3.7-rc3
References: <20121115110620.GA3451@elf.ucw.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20121115110620.GA3451@elf.ucw.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 983
Lines: 27

On 11/15/2012 03:06 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Supervisor Mode Access Prevention (X86_SMAP) [Y/n/?] (NEW)
> 
> ...Slows stuff down, eats memory, only works on unreleased Intel CPUs
> (from 2013!)  perhaps should be off by default?
> 
> "Supervisor Mode Access Prevention (SMAP) is a security
> feature in newer Intel processors.  There is a small
> performance cost if this enabled and turned on; there is
> also a small increase in the kernel size if this is enabled."
> 

*Extremely* small.  Unless you are targeting a specific processor there
is no point in disabling it.  If anyone can find a non-SMAP processor on
which the overhead is measurable I would be highly surprised, except
perhaps some embedded 486 clone.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/