Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S318059AbSIJTaQ>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:30:16 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S318058AbSIJTaQ>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:30:16 -0400
Received: from pD9E23544.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.226.53.68]:37309 "EHLO
	hawkeye.luckynet.adm") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S318059AbSIJTaO>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:30:14 -0400
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 13:33:41 -0600 (MDT)
From: Thunder from the hill <thunder@lightweight.ods.org>
X-X-Sender: thunder@hawkeye.luckynet.adm
To: Shawn <core@enodev.com>
cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
       Thunder from the hill <thunder@lightweight.ods.org>,
       <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: XFS?
In-Reply-To: <20020910142347.A5000@q.mn.rr.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209101332140.3793-100000@hawkeye.luckynet.adm>
X-Location: Dorndorf/Steudnitz; Germany
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 826
Lines: 22

Hi,

On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Shawn wrote:
> Linus incorporated reiserfs long before it "always functioned as it is
> supposed to", so I find myself wondering where your point was.

It was my point, actually. I was referring to some crashes caused by XFS, 
however, they seem resolved. I also want to be commonly known as not 
hating XFS. It seems pretty cool.

			Thunder
-- 
--./../...-/. -.--/---/..-/.-./..././.-../..-. .---/..-/.../- .-
--/../-./..-/-/./--..-- ../.----./.-../.-.. --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-
.- -/---/--/---/.-./.-./---/.--/.-.-.-
--./.-/-.../.-./.././.-../.-.-.-

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/