Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:30:05 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20121118.203005.151867624663051294.davem@davemloft.net>
To: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, monstr@monstr.eu,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sigaltstack fun
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20121119011013.GJ16916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <20121118210253.GI16916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
	<20121118.161833.985081954687473276.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20121119011013.GJ16916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1224
Lines: 31

From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:10:13 +0000

> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 04:18:33PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
>> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:02:53 +0000
>> 
>> > Are you OK with the patch below?  Should be the minimal fix, getting
>> > rid of those segfaults and converting to usual semantics here...
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
>> 
>> Yep, looks fine:
>> 
>> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> 
> Er...  So which tree should that go through?  sparc or signal?  There's
> a similar microblaze patch and a few more of the "do_sigaltstack() takes
> userland pointer" variety, so I can put together a pile in
> signal.git#for-linus, but if you prefer that to go through sparc tree,
> I'm fine with that...

I'm happy to take it via my sparc tree, and I'll queue it up for
-stable as well. Can you resend it to me with a proper commit message?

Thanks a lot Al.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/