Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752751Ab2KSOcn (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:32:43 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:50362 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752498Ab2KSOcm (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:32:42 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,279,1352102400"; d="scan'208";a="221684516" Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:32:36 +0200 From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Rob Clark , Russell King - ARM Linux , patches@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: add get_user() support for 8 byte types Message-ID: <20121119143236.GA3296@intel.com> References: <1352495853-9790-1-git-send-email-rob.clark@linaro.org> <201211151339.08016.arnd@arndb.de> <201211151439.41393.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <201211151439.41393.arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1389 Lines: 31 On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 02:39:41PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 15 November 2012, Rob Clark wrote: > > > I still haven't heard a conclusive argument why we need to use get_user() > > > rather than copy_from_user() in the DRM code. Is this about a fast path > > > where you want to shave off a few cycles for each call, or does this > > > simplify the code structure, or something else? > > > > well, it is mostly because it seemed like a good idea to first try to > > solve the root issue, rather than having to fix things up in each > > driver when someone from x86-world introduces a 64b get_user().. > > As pointed out by hpa earlier, x86-32 doesn't have a 64b get_user > either. I don't think we have a lot of drivers that are used only > on 64-bit x86 and on 32-bit ARM but not on 32-bit x86. Ouch. I didn't realize that x86-32 doesn't have it. All the systems where I've run the new code are 64bit so I never noticed the problem. I see there was a patch [1] posted a long time ago to implement 64bit get_user() on x86-32. I wonder what happened to it? [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/4/20/96 -- Ville Syrj?l? Intel OTC -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/