Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 07:44:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 07:44:25 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:43421 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 07:44:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:49:03 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Oleg Drokin Cc: Ingo Molnar , Robert Love , Thomas Molina , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andre@linux-ide.org Subject: Re: 2.5 Problem Status Report Message-ID: <20020911114903.GK1089@suse.de> References: <20020911112808.A6341@namesys.com> <20020911120551.A937@namesys.com> <20020911102507.GA1364@suse.de> <20020911102926.GB1364@suse.de> <20020911144740.A911@namesys.com> <20020911105807.GF1089@suse.de> <20020911151602.A830@namesys.com> <20020911111726.GJ1089@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020911111726.GJ1089@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 740 Lines: 19 On Wed, Sep 11 2002, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Ok, with other patch it still fails in the same way. > > I have not backed out other patch so I tested with both patches perent. > > alright, seems I do have to try it myself... ok will do that. with both patches I sent applied, the bug does _not_ exist here as expected. could you please double check that they are applied, and that you have booted the right kernel? a make clean just to be on the safe side might be a good idea :-) -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/