Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:15:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:15:58 -0400 Received: from schroeder.cs.wisc.edu ([128.105.6.11]:41993 "EHLO schroeder.cs.wisc.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:15:57 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Nick LeRoy Organization: UW Condor To: jw schultz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: XFS? Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 08:20:36 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <200209101518.31538.nleroy@cs.wisc.edu> <20020911084327.GF6085@pegasys.ws> In-Reply-To: <20020911084327.GF6085@pegasys.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200209110820.36925.nleroy@cs.wisc.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2407 Lines: 49 On Wednesday 11 September 2002 01:43, jw schultz wrote: Not that I'm trying to keep this thread alive or anything.. > Yes it does. I'm guessing the one in 8.0 is an older > version because i found it performs abysmally. It seemed > stable enough but i used it for backups with lots of file > creation and deletion and my jobs took about 10 times longer > to run than on ext2 or JFS (also included in the 2.4.18+ > SuSE 8.0) For other use it is probably fine. I look > forward to trying newer versions. I wasn't making any claims to have _tried_ it or anything. I simply stated that it's _there_ and, I think, supported. Personally, I've switched to Reiserfs (thanks, Hans!), which I'm _really_ happy with. Yeah, I should investigate the other options, but, honestly, there isn't a lot of neccessity to. > And think about this: In almost all other OSs of substance > you have one or two basic filesystem types and if you want > journaling you have to pay extra for it. And journaling > filesystems don't have to be fast, there is very little real > competition. I'm not sure if you're saying that this is a bad thing or a good thing. FWIW, I think this is a wonderful feature, albeit potentially confusing to a Newbie For my O2 running IRIX I get XFS whether I like it or not, for Solaris I get UFS no matter how much it sucks (I'm not really saying that it does; I don't have much knowledge of it to be honest). This multitude of choices really causes competition between them, and makes them all better in the long run. Think about this: Namesys is working on Reiserfs v4.0. v4.0. Hell - it's only been incorporated into the mainstream kernel for less than a year (at least by my recollection), yet it keeps advancing. I have _no_ idea what UFS version Solaris 8 is using (admittedly at least somewhat due to ignorance -- I use Solaris because I have a good ol' SPARCprinter which alas is not supported by Linux), or whether they've bother to do development on it to make it better, faster, etc. Yet, _we_ get this advancement all the time. Isn't it great?! Ok, time to step off my soapbox and get back to work. -Nick - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/