Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:56:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:56:40 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust128.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.128]:17143 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:56:40 -0400 Subject: Re: XFS? From: Alan Cox To: Bill Davidsen Cc: Andi Kleen , Thunder from the hill , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-6) Date: 11 Sep 2002 17:03:49 +0100 Message-Id: <1031760229.2768.54.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 747 Lines: 15 On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 16:12, Bill Davidsen wrote: > More to the point, a quick scan of LKML will show that there are fixes for > ext3 and reisser on a regular basis, so one must assume that they don't > always work as they should either. XFS is in a number of distributions, > and is stable for users. Thats never been the big concern. The problem has always been that XFS was very invasive code so it might break stuff for people who dont choose to use experimental xfs stuff. Thats slowly improving - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/