Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:17:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:15:51 -0400 Received: from 2-210.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.160.210]:54485 "EHLO 2-210.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:14:07 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:18:29 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Andrew Morton cc: Daniel Phillips , Chuck Lever , , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: invalidate_inode_pages in 2.5.32/3 In-Reply-To: <3D7E8936.9882E929@digeo.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 853 Lines: 25 On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Andrew Morton wrote: > We _could_ walk the pte chain in writeback. But that would involve > visiting every page in the mapping, basically. That could hurt. > > But if a page is already dirty, and we're going to write it anyway, > it makes tons of sense to run around and clean all the ptes which > point at it. Walking ptes probably doesn't hurt as much as doing extra disk IO, so I guess you're right ;) Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/