Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755249Ab2KUPqu (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:46:50 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:60791 "EHLO mail-ob0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755106Ab2KUPqs (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:46:48 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121120180949.GG1408@quack.suse.cz> References: <20121120180949.GG1408@quack.suse.cz> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 23:46:47 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Recent kernel "mount" slow From: Jeff Chua To: Jan Kara Cc: lkml , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 755 Lines: 19 On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Jan Kara wrote: > I haven't heard about such problem so far. What filesystem are you using? I've tried ext2/ext3/ext4/reiserfs/btrfs ... all seems to be slower than before. Seems to be fs independent. > Can you quantify 'is slower'? Bisecting would be welcome of course. Haven't measure, but it seems to be 1 sec instead of .3 sec to mount. I'll start bisecting:( So, since I've 6 mounts on start up, now it takes 4 seconds longer to boot up. Thanks, Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/