Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:17:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:15:48 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust128.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.128]:48887 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:09:25 -0400 Subject: Re: ignore pci devices? From: Alan Cox To: Gerd Knorr Cc: Martin Mares , Kernel List In-Reply-To: <20020911153750.GA8649@bytesex.org> References: <20020910134708.GA7836@bytesex.org> <20020910163023.GA3862@ucw.cz> <1031683362.1537.104.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20020910184128.GA5627@ucw.cz> <1031688912.31787.129.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20020911122048.GA6863@bytesex.org> <1031747880.2726.40.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20020911153750.GA8649@bytesex.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-6) Date: 11 Sep 2002 17:17:39 +0100 Message-Id: <1031761059.2768.68.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 724 Lines: 17 On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 16:37, Gerd Knorr wrote: > guess you mean pci_assign_resource()? Played with that one, now my > /proc/iomem file looks *ahem* intresting. Is this the bug mentioned > above? Well I've not seen it appear that way but I guess it could do - the old code on finding a clash when reserving PCI resources (and you'll tickle that anyway with pci_module_init and two candidate drivers) freed resources it never allocated. I'd have expected lots of printks first - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/