Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932483Ab2KWG21 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Nov 2012 01:28:27 -0500 Received: from fallback3.mail.ru ([94.100.176.58]:48671 "EHLO fallback3.mail.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754079Ab2KWG2Z (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Nov 2012 01:28:25 -0500 From: =?UTF-8?B?QWxleGFuZGVyIFNoaXlhbg==?= To: =?UTF-8?B?QW50b24gVm9yb250c292?= Cc: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmV3IE1vcnRvbg==?= , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, =?UTF-8?B?UnVzc2VsbCBLaW5n?= , patches@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?B?Sm9obiBTdHVsdHo=?= , =?UTF-8?B?SmFzb24gV2Vzc2Vs?= , kernel-team@android.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmVbMl06IFtQQVRDSCAxMC8xMF0gQVJNOiBGSVE6IEdldCByaWQgb2YgaW5p?= =?UTF-8?B?dF9GSVEoKQ==?= Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [217.119.30.118] Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:27:51 +0400 References: <20121123003849.GA973@lizard.mcd25758.sjc.wayport.net> <1353642030.851395840@f20.mail.ru> <20121123055328.GA21566@lizard> In-Reply-To: <20121123055328.GA21566@lizard> Reply-To: =?UTF-8?B?QWxleGFuZGVyIFNoaXlhbg==?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1353652071.755665772@f76.mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Spam: Not detected X-Mras: Ok Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id qAN6SY0b011296 Content-Length: 1793 Lines: 42 > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 07:40:30AM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > [...] > > > static unsigned long no_fiq_insn; > > > +static int got_no_fiq_insn; > > > @@ -78,11 +79,14 @@ void show_fiq_list(struct seq_file *p, int prec) > > > > > > void set_fiq_handler(void *start, unsigned int length) > > > { > > > -#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_USE_DOMAINS) > > > - memcpy((void *)0xffff001c, start, length); > > > -#else > > > - memcpy(vectors_page + 0x1c, start, length); > > > + unsigned long *addr = (void *)0xffff001c; > > > + > > > +#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_USE_DOMAINS > > > + addr = vectors_page + 0x1c; > > > #endif > > > + if (!cmpxchg(&got_no_fiq_insn, 0, 1)) > > > + no_fiq_insn = *addr; > > > + memcpy(addr, start, length); > > > flush_icache_range(0xffff001c, 0xffff001c + length); > > > if (!vectors_high()) > > > flush_icache_range(0x1c, 0x1c + length); > > > @@ -126,8 +130,3 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__set_fiq_regs); /* defined in fiqasm.S */ > > > - > > > -void __init init_FIQ(void) > > > -{ > > > - no_fiq_insn = *(unsigned long *)0xffff001c; > > > > it seems that this is wrong. In this case we have an uninitialized variable and > > sequential call claim_fiq and release_fiq could be fatal. FIXME please. > > Um... I don't think I understand, can you please elaborate? OK, I'll try to explain it. At the end of the release_fiq function we have a call fiq_op. For the default handler - is a fiq_def_op function, and we call this function with the option "relinquish = 0", i.e. we want to restore old fiq_handler. But if we do not call set_fiq_handler never before, we will have an uninitialized no_fiq_insn variable. --- ????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?