Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753279Ab2KZPwO (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:52:14 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:33390 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751406Ab2KZPwN (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:52:13 -0500 Message-ID: <50B38F69.6020902@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 07:48:57 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tang Chen CC: wujianguo , akpm@linux-foundation.org, rob@landley.net, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, jiang.liu@huawei.com, yinghai@kernel.org, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, minchan.kim@gmail.com, mgorman@suse.de, rientjes@google.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, wujianguo@huawei.com, qiuxishi@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] page_alloc: Bootmem limit with movablecore_map References: <1353667445-7593-1-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> <1353667445-7593-6-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> <50B36354.7040501@gmail.com> <50B36B54.7050506@cn.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <50B36B54.7050506@cn.fujitsu.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1007 Lines: 26 On 11/26/2012 05:15 AM, Tang Chen wrote: > > Hi Wu, > > That is really a problem. And, before numa memory got initialized, > memblock subsystem would be used to allocate memory. I didn't find any > approach that could fully address it when I making the patches. There > always be risk that memblock allocates memory on ZONE_MOVABLE. I think > we can only do our best to prevent it from happening. > > Your patch is very helpful. And after a shot look at the code, it seems > that acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() is an architecture dependent > function. Could we do this somewhere which is not depending on the > architecture ? > The movable memory should be classified as a non-RAM type in memblock, that way we will not allocate from it early on. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/