Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932686Ab2KZRFg (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:05:36 -0500 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:47443 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932651Ab2KZRF2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:05:28 -0500 From: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Cc: Alex Elder , Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski Subject: [PATCH 091/270] libceph: make ceph_con_revoke_message() a msg op Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:56:21 -0200 Message-Id: <1353949160-26803-92-git-send-email-herton.krzesinski@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5 In-Reply-To: <1353949160-26803-1-git-send-email-herton.krzesinski@canonical.com> References: <1353949160-26803-1-git-send-email-herton.krzesinski@canonical.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 5210 Lines: 133 3.5.7u1 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Alex Elder commit 8921d114f5574c6da2cdd00749d185633ecf88f3 upstream. ceph_con_revoke_message() is passed both a message and a ceph connection. A ceph_msg allocated for incoming messages on a connection always has a pointer to that connection, so there's no need to provide the connection when revoking such a message. Note that the existing logic does not preclude the message supplied being a null/bogus message pointer. The only user of this interface is the OSD client, and the only value an osd client passes is a request's r_reply field. That is always non-null (except briefly in an error path in ceph_osdc_alloc_request(), and that drops the only reference so the request won't ever have a reply to revoke). So we can safely assume the passed-in message is non-null, but add a BUG_ON() to make it very obvious we are imposing this restriction. Rename the function ceph_msg_revoke_incoming() to reflect that it is really an operation on an incoming message. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder Reviewed-by: Sage Weil Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski --- include/linux/ceph/messenger.h | 4 ++-- net/ceph/messenger.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------ net/ceph/osd_client.c | 9 ++++----- 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/ceph/messenger.h b/include/linux/ceph/messenger.h index 13bd9cd..9c1f755 100644 --- a/include/linux/ceph/messenger.h +++ b/include/linux/ceph/messenger.h @@ -233,8 +233,8 @@ extern void ceph_con_close(struct ceph_connection *con); extern void ceph_con_send(struct ceph_connection *con, struct ceph_msg *msg); extern void ceph_msg_revoke(struct ceph_msg *msg); -extern void ceph_con_revoke_message(struct ceph_connection *con, - struct ceph_msg *msg); +extern void ceph_msg_revoke_incoming(struct ceph_msg *msg); + extern void ceph_con_keepalive(struct ceph_connection *con); extern struct ceph_connection *ceph_con_get(struct ceph_connection *con); extern void ceph_con_put(struct ceph_connection *con); diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger.c b/net/ceph/messenger.c index 81d8373..ff12d32 100644 --- a/net/ceph/messenger.c +++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c @@ -2460,17 +2460,27 @@ void ceph_msg_revoke(struct ceph_msg *msg) /* * Revoke a message that we may be reading data into */ -void ceph_con_revoke_message(struct ceph_connection *con, struct ceph_msg *msg) +void ceph_msg_revoke_incoming(struct ceph_msg *msg) { + struct ceph_connection *con; + + BUG_ON(msg == NULL); + if (!msg->con) { + dout("%s msg %p null con\n", __func__, msg); + + return; /* Message not in our possession */ + } + + con = msg->con; mutex_lock(&con->mutex); - if (con->in_msg && con->in_msg == msg) { + if (con->in_msg == msg) { unsigned int front_len = le32_to_cpu(con->in_hdr.front_len); unsigned int middle_len = le32_to_cpu(con->in_hdr.middle_len); unsigned int data_len = le32_to_cpu(con->in_hdr.data_len); /* skip rest of message */ - dout("con_revoke_pages %p msg %p revoked\n", con, msg); - con->in_base_pos = con->in_base_pos - + dout("%s %p msg %p revoked\n", __func__, con, msg); + con->in_base_pos = con->in_base_pos - sizeof(struct ceph_msg_header) - front_len - middle_len - @@ -2481,8 +2491,8 @@ void ceph_con_revoke_message(struct ceph_connection *con, struct ceph_msg *msg) con->in_tag = CEPH_MSGR_TAG_READY; con->in_seq++; } else { - dout("con_revoke_pages %p msg %p pages %p no-op\n", - con, con->in_msg, msg); + dout("%s %p in_msg %p msg %p no-op\n", + __func__, con, con->in_msg, msg); } mutex_unlock(&con->mutex); } diff --git a/net/ceph/osd_client.c b/net/ceph/osd_client.c index d934c85..db2da54 100644 --- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c +++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c @@ -140,10 +140,9 @@ void ceph_osdc_release_request(struct kref *kref) if (req->r_request) ceph_msg_put(req->r_request); if (req->r_con_filling_msg) { - dout("release_request revoking pages %p from con %p\n", + dout("%s revoking pages %p from con %p\n", __func__, req->r_pages, req->r_con_filling_msg); - ceph_con_revoke_message(req->r_con_filling_msg, - req->r_reply); + ceph_msg_revoke_incoming(req->r_reply); req->r_con_filling_msg->ops->put(req->r_con_filling_msg); } if (req->r_reply) @@ -2022,9 +2021,9 @@ static struct ceph_msg *get_reply(struct ceph_connection *con, } if (req->r_con_filling_msg) { - dout("get_reply revoking msg %p from old con %p\n", + dout("%s revoking msg %p from old con %p\n", __func__, req->r_reply, req->r_con_filling_msg); - ceph_con_revoke_message(req->r_con_filling_msg, req->r_reply); + ceph_msg_revoke_incoming(req->r_reply); req->r_con_filling_msg->ops->put(req->r_con_filling_msg); req->r_con_filling_msg = NULL; } -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/