Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 10:06:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 10:06:52 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust128.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.128]:10741 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 10:06:52 -0400 Subject: Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 From: Alan Cox To: Todd Underwood Cc: jamal , "David S. Miller" , "tcw@tempest.prismnet.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@oss.sgi.com" , patricia gilfeather In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-7) Date: 12 Sep 2002 15:11:23 +0100 Message-Id: <1031839883.2994.84.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 798 Lines: 15 On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 14:57, Todd Underwood wrote: > thanks. although i'd love to take credit, i don't think that the > reverse-order fragmentation appreciation is all that original: who > wouldn't want their data sctructure size determined up-front? :-) (not to > mention getting header-overwriting for-free as part of the single copy. As far as I am aware it was original when Linux first did it (and we broke cisco pix, some boot proms, some sco in the process). Credit goes to Arnt Gulbrandsen probably better known nowdays for his work on Qt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/