Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757756Ab2K0BWJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:22:09 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:45537 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755658Ab2K0BWI (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:22:08 -0500 Message-ID: <50B41573.4020205@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:20:51 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jiang Liu CC: Tang Chen , wujianguo , akpm@linux-foundation.org, rob@landley.net, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, yinghai@kernel.org, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, minchan.kim@gmail.com, mgorman@suse.de, rientjes@google.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, wujianguo@huawei.com, qiuxishi@huawei.com, Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] page_alloc: Bootmem limit with movablecore_map References: <1353667445-7593-1-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> <1353667445-7593-6-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> <50B36354.7040501@gmail.com> <50B36B54.7050506@cn.fujitsu.com> <50B38F69.6020902@zytor.com> <50B41395.60808@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <50B41395.60808@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1100 Lines: 30 On 11/26/2012 05:12 PM, Jiang Liu wrote: > Hi Peter, > > I have tried to reserved movable memory from bootmem allocator, but the > ACPICA subsystem is initialized later than setting up movable zone. > So still trying to figure out a way to setup/reserve movable zones > according to information from static ACPI tables such as SRAT/MPST etc. > [Adding Len Brown] Right, for the case of platform-configured memory. Len, I'm wondering if there is any reasonable way we can get memory-map-related stuff out of ACPI before we initialize the full ACPICA... we could of course write an ad hoc static parser (these are just static tables, after all), but I'm not sure if that fits into your overall view of how the subsystem should work? -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/