Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933042Ab2K0CHG (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:07:06 -0500 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:49292 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932633Ab2K0CHE convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:07:04 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:06:45 -0800 (PST) From: Mary Mcgrath To: Joe Jin Cc: "Dave, Tushar N" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, e1000-devel@lists.sf.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang References: <509B5038.8090304@oracle.com> <061C8A8601E8EE4CA8D8FD6990CEA89133487884@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com> <50A30656.6090508@oracle.com> <061C8A8601E8EE4CA8D8FD6990CEA8913348B105@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com> <50A43828.6000702@oracle.com> <061C8A8601E8EE4CA8D8FD6990CEA8913349A0B4@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com> <50A9C5CC.1030300@oracle.com> <061C8A8601E8EE4CA8D8FD6990CEA8913349EB41@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com> <50AB8471.7080607@oracle.com> <9B4A1B1917080E46B64F07F2989DADD62F2D62D6@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com> <50B41077.3080009@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <50B41077.3080009@oracle.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.7 (607090) [OL 12.0.6665.5003 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1580 Lines: 40 Joe Thank you for working this. I would love to find out how they expect a customer to make the modification To "word 0x1A, and see if the 8th bit is 0 or 1, and to change to 0." I have in turn asked the ct for the lspci command on eth3, maybe the incorrect setting is upstream. Again, thank you. Regards Mary -----Original Message----- From: Joe Jin Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 8:00 PM To: Fujinaka, Todd Cc: Dave, Tushar N; netdev@vger.kernel.org; e1000-devel@lists.sf.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Mary Mcgrath Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang On 11/27/12 00:23, Fujinaka, Todd wrote: > If you look at the previous section, DevCap, you'll see that it's > correctly advertising 256 bytes but the system is negotiating 128 for > the link to the Ethernet controller. Things on the "other" side of the > link are controlled outside of the e1000 driver. > > Tushar's first suggestion was to check the PCIe payload settings in > the entire chain. Have you done that? Mismatches will cause hangs. Hi Todd, So far I had to know how to modify the maxpayload size, since BIOS have not entry to change this, so I had to use ethtool, now I need to get the offset of MaxPayload size in eeprom, I ever tried to find from Intel online document but failed, any idea? Thanks in advance, Joe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/