Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:04:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:04:40 -0400 Received: from 2-028.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.160.28]:3268 "EHLO 2-028.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:04:39 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 16:09:08 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Jim Sibley cc: Thunder from the hill , , Giuliano Pochini Subject: RE: Killing/balancing processes when overcommited In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 743 Lines: 21 On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Jim Sibley wrote: > I still favor an installation file in /etc specifying the order in which > things are to be killed. Any alogrithmic assumptions are bound to fail at > some point to the dissatisfaction of the installation. That's all fine and well, but somebody will have to implement this. ;) Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/