From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6 v5] cpufreq: add support for Calxeda ECX-1000 (highbank)
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:04:44 +0100
Message-ID: <3361516.Nl27KtHLfN@vostro.rjw.lan>
User-Agent: KMail/4.9.3 (Linux/3.7.0-rc7; KDE/4.9.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <1354028674-23685-1-git-send-email-mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com>
References: <1351631056-25938-1-git-send-email-mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com> <1354028674-23685-1-git-send-email-mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 985
Lines: 27

On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 09:04:28 AM Mark Langsdorf wrote:
> This patch series adds cpufreq support for the Calxeda
> ECX-1000 (highbank) SoCs. The driver is based on the 
> cpufreq-cpu0 driver. Because of the unique way that 
> highbank uses the EnergyCore Management Engine to manage
> voltages, it was not possible to use the cpufreq-cpu0 driver.

Well, Thomas still seems to be unhappy with [4/6], although those don't seem
to be essential points.

Can you please address his comments?

I can't promise I'll take it to my first pull request during the upcoming merge
window, but it looks like there will be a second one anyway.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/