Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754499Ab2K1AoT (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2012 19:44:19 -0500 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:41898 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753692Ab2K1AoQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2012 19:44:16 -0500 X-SecurityPolicyCheck: OK by SHieldMailChecker v1.7.4 Message-ID: <50B55E28.1030608@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 09:43:20 +0900 From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Wen Congyang , , , , , , , , , , , David Rientjes , Jiang Liu , Len Brown , , , Christoph Lameter , Minchan Kim , KOSAKI Motohiro , Jianguo Wu Subject: Re: [Patch v4 00/12] memory-hotplug: hot-remove physical memory References: <1354010422-19648-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> <20121127112741.b616c2f6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20121127112741.b616c2f6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1916 Lines: 61 Hi Andrew, 2012/11/28 4:27, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:00:10 +0800 > Wen Congyang wrote: > >> The patch-set was divided from following thread's patch-set. >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/5/201 >> >> The last version of this patchset: >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/1/93 > > As we're now at -rc7 I'd prefer to take a look at all of this after the > 3.7 release - please resend everything shortly after 3.8-rc1. Almost patches about memory hotplug has been merged into your and Rafael's tree. And these patches are waiting to open the v3.8 merge window. Remaining patches are only this patch-set. So we hope that this patch-set is merged into v3.8. In merging this patch-set into v3.8, Linux on x86_64 makes a memory hot plug possible. Thanks, Yasuaki Ishimatsu > >> If you want to know the reason, please read following thread. >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/2/83 > > Please include the rationale within each version of the patchset rather > than by linking to an old email. Because > > a) this way, more people are likely to read it > > b) it permits the text to be maimtained as the code evolves > > c) it permits the text to be included in the mainlnie commit, where > people can find it. > >> The patch-set has only the function of kernel core side for physical >> memory hot remove. So if you use the patch, please apply following >> patches. >> >> - bug fix for memory hot remove >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/31/269 >> >> - acpi framework >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/26/175 > > What's happening with the acpi framework? has it received any feedback > from the ACPI developers? > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/