Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 17:51:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 17:51:34 -0400 Received: from pD9E23F87.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.226.63.135]:6120 "EHLO hawkeye.luckynet.adm") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 17:51:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:56:19 -0600 (MDT) From: Thunder from the hill X-X-Sender: thunder@hawkeye.luckynet.adm To: Jesse Pollard cc: Alan Cox , Jim Sibley , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Giuliano Pochini , Subject: Re: Killing/balancing processes when overcommited In-Reply-To: <200209121619.53111.pollard@admin.navo.hpc.mil> Message-ID: X-Location: Dorndorf/Steudnitz; Germany MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1033 Lines: 30 Hi, On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Jesse Pollard wrote: > ulimit is a per login limit, not a global per user limit. I see... Wonderous that I've forgot that. > Now, which of these processes should be killed? ...the last of the user who has the most processes? I still don't think that a whitelist could be that good. And however, it doesn't stand against my suggestion. Firstly kill processes which likely deadloop on malloc, then the unlisted, and then the rest. All under the cover of overcommitment... ...Linux, the best-tinkered OOM-killing operating system... Thunder -- --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-/.-./..././.-../..-. .---/..-/.../- .- --/../-./..-/-/./--..-- ../.----./.-../.-.. --./../...-/. -.--/---/..- .- -/---/--/---/.-./.-./---/.--/.-.-.- --./.-/-.../.-./.././.-../.-.-.- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/