Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754444Ab2K1Mcu (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 07:32:50 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:31384 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754100Ab2K1Mcs (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 07:32:48 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,177,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="248477836" Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:36:01 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: Grant Likely Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linus Walleij , w.sang@pengutronix.de, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, khali@linux-fr.org, ben-linux@fluff.org, bhelgaas@google.com, mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C Message-ID: <20121128123601.GU3867@intel.com> References: <1353407384-26880-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <79636467.nuLQX2FqW5@vostro.rjw.lan> <12328820.crXDTeuliY@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <12328820.crXDTeuliY@vostro.rjw.lan> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1375 Lines: 32 On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:03:26AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, November 22, 2012 10:43:28 AM Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > This patchset has been around for quite a while and went through a few > > > iterations, so I think it's as good as it gets at this point. > > > > > > I wonder if the GPIO / SPI / I2C maintainers have any objections against it or > > > would like the patches to be modified somehow? > > > > > > If not, then I'd like to take it for v3.8 into the linux-pm.git tree, because > > > the patches depend on some changes already in that tree. Hopefully, that's OK. > > > > For GPIO I want Grant to ACK this. > > > > He has experience with both Device Tree and GPIO, knows what ACPI and > > UEFI is and is way better suited than me to give feedback on this kind of > > stuff. > > > > So from my stance it's "neutral, whatever Grant says goes". > > OK, we're waiting for a word from Grant, then. :-) Grant, do you have any input on this? Do you want us to change something in order to get these merged? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/