Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 21:16:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 21:16:11 -0400 Received: from bg77.anu.edu.au ([150.203.223.77]:49106 "EHLO lassus.himi.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 21:16:10 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 11:20:56 +1000 From: Simon Fowler To: Allan Duncan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.20-pre4 & ff. blows away Xwindows with Matrox G400 and agpgart Message-ID: <20020913012056.GA10432@himi.org> Mail-Followup-To: Allan Duncan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen References: <3D7FF444.87980B8E@bigpond.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <20020912213201.GA9168@himi.org> <3D811B12.A6615688@bigpond.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AqsLC8rIMeq19msA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D811B12.A6615688@bigpond.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2098 Lines: 64 --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 08:54:10AM +1000, Allan Duncan wrote: > Not in my case, at least for 2.4.20-pre4. >=20 2.4.19 works for me with nopentium, 2.4.20-pre5 fails with nopentium and works without it - I can't add anything beyond that. > At which kernels does the nopentium become obsolete? Alan Cox mentioned = some > confusion about this. Obviously the latest ones, but does this extend as= far > back as 2.4.19? >=20 > In order to close in on what changes are triggering this, I found the pat= ch for > sched.c for -pre3 and ran that, and find that -pre3 is fine with or with= out > nopentium, so that narrows it to what was altered pre3 to pre4. >=20 > There was nothing obvious in Marcelo's log of changes, so I will trawl th= rough > the diffs themselves tonight. >=20 > At the same time, I noticed that there seems to a fair bit of touchy > behaviour of AGP out there, so maybe what is proving fatal to me is the s= ame as > the cause of flaky for others. AGP/DRI has been flaky for me in all sorts of ways, but then I've been using the DRI CVS code which does lots of strange things, so I can't pin the problems on AGP . . . Simon --=20 PGP public key Id 0x144A991C, or ftp://bg77.anu.edu.au/pub/himi/himi.asc (crappy) Homepage: http://bg77.anu.edu.au doe #237 (see http://www.lemuria.org/DeCSS)=20 My DeCSS mirror: ftp://bg77.anu.edu.au/pub/mirrors/css/=20 --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9gT13QPlfmRRKmRwRAmPNAJ0Y1epu+WByrdQOQMMxC4rZ4trhNQCfTKFu y8QFqwYxzD+erTA9G9oTDa0= =d27+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/