Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 21:51:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 21:50:19 -0400 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:12240 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 21:50:10 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Kai Germaschewski Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generated files destruction In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:53:45 EST." Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 10:42:08 +1000 Message-Id: <20020913015502.29C4E2C08B@lists.samba.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1346 Lines: 30 In message y ou write: > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > I would like to start migrating all build-generated files to > > names matching "generated*" or ".generated*", esp. those which look > > like source files. This is mainly for readability and for simplicity > > when diffing built kernel trees. I'll be encouraging various > > maintainers who generate (.c, .h and .s) files which are not meant to > > be shipped with the kernel source to migrate, in my copious free > > time... > > I think the proper solution here is actually separate obj/src dirs, > instead of special names. It's actually quite easy to get that implemented > in the current kbuild, I just didn't find the time for proper testing yet. > I'll have a patch ready for testing soon, though. Sure, if it basically comes for free. Otherwise, I don't see any attraction in separating them: cp -al linux-2.5.34 working-2.5.34-foo takes a couple of seconds. Cheers! Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/