Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753030Ab2K2Jeg (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2012 04:34:36 -0500 Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:54755 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752687Ab2K2Jee (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2012 04:34:34 -0500 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:34:28 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Viresh Kumar Cc: sameo@linux.intel.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, rabin.vincent@stericsson.com, shiraz.hashim@st.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, spear-devel@list.st.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 Resend 2/3] mfd: stmpe: Remove irq_trigger from platform data Message-ID: <20121129093428.GV2013@gmail.com> References: <33d71d9d29a3edd2c4a33e0f187cdb89f344af72.1354128258.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <33d71d9d29a3edd2c4a33e0f187cdb89f344af72.1354128258.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3237 Lines: 90 On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote: > STMPE can confige configure? > the way the device emits interrupts and till now this until? > information is passed as part of platform data. > > It would actually be good to ask the interrupt controller driver what kind of > interrupt signal it expects for a given interrupt line. We can get the irq type > by calling: irqd_get_trigger_type() routine. > > So, now we don't need to pass it via platform data. This is earlier discussed > here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/26/711 > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > --- > > @Linus/Shiraz: Can you please test this patch? You don't really need to test 1/3 > and 3/3, but would be good if you do that too.. > > This is actually V1 of this patch. > > arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500-stuib.c | 1 - > drivers/mfd/stmpe.c | 7 ++++--- > include/linux/mfd/stmpe.h | 2 -- > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500-stuib.c b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500-stuib.c > index 564f57d..0efcf97 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500-stuib.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500-stuib.c > @@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ static struct stmpe_keypad_platform_data stmpe1601_keypad_data = { > static struct stmpe_platform_data stmpe1601_data = { > .id = 1, > .blocks = STMPE_BLOCK_KEYPAD, > - .irq_trigger = IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING, > .irq_base = MOP500_STMPE1601_IRQ(0), > .keypad = &stmpe1601_keypad_data, > .autosleep = true, > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/stmpe.c b/drivers/mfd/stmpe.c > index 34408b4..10819e6 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/stmpe.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/stmpe.c > @@ -914,7 +914,6 @@ static int __devinit stmpe_irq_init(struct stmpe *stmpe, > > static int __devinit stmpe_chip_init(struct stmpe *stmpe) > { > - unsigned int irq_trigger = stmpe->pdata->irq_trigger; > int autosleep_timeout = stmpe->pdata->autosleep_timeout; > struct stmpe_variant_info *variant = stmpe->variant; > u8 icr = 0; > @@ -941,6 +940,9 @@ static int __devinit stmpe_chip_init(struct stmpe *stmpe) > return ret; > > if (stmpe->irq >= 0) { > + unsigned int irq_trigger = > + irqd_get_trigger_type(irq_get_irq_data(stmpe->irq)); > + > if (id == STMPE801_ID) > icr = STMPE801_REG_SYS_CTRL_INT_EN; > else > @@ -1118,8 +1120,7 @@ int __devinit stmpe_probe(struct stmpe_client_info *ci, int partnum) > return ret; > > ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(ci->dev, stmpe->irq, NULL, > - stmpe_irq, pdata->irq_trigger | IRQF_ONESHOT, > - "stmpe", stmpe); > + stmpe_irq, IRQF_ONESHOT, "stmpe", stmpe); Forgive my ignorance, but you're no longer passing irq_trigger. Is this intentional? If so, why was it needed before and not now? -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/