Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753875Ab2K2TC1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:02:27 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:64419 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752745Ab2K2TC0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:02:26 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,186,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="255186737" From: Andi Kleen To: Dave Chinner Cc: glommer@parallels.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 00/19] Numa aware LRU lists and shrinkers References: <1354058086-27937-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:02:24 -0800 In-Reply-To: <1354058086-27937-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (Dave Chinner's message of "Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:14:27 +1100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 554 Lines: 17 Dave Chinner writes: > > Comments, thoughts and flames all welcome. Doing the reclaim per CPU sounds like a big change in the VM balance. Doesn't this invalidate some zone reclaim mode settings? How did you validate all this? -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/