Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754765Ab2K2TZV (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:25:21 -0500 Received: from 50-56-35-84.static.cloud-ips.com ([50.56.35.84]:51849 "EHLO mail.hallyn.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753633Ab2K2TZR (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:25:17 -0500 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:29:45 +0000 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: Aristeu Rozanski Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Serge Hallyn , cgroups@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] device_cgroup: keep track of local group settings Message-ID: <20121129192945.GD26104@mail.hallyn.com> References: <20121127193501.255267751@napanee.usersys.redhat.com> <20121127193502.482004744@napanee.usersys.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121127193502.482004744@napanee.usersys.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1585 Lines: 39 Quoting Aristeu Rozanski (aris@redhat.com): > In preparation for better hierarchy support, it's needed to retain the local > settings in order to try to reapply them after a propagated change if they're > still valid. > > Cc: Tejun Heo > Cc: Serge Hallyn > Signed-off-by: Aristeu Rozanski > > --- > security/device_cgroup.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) Hi, thanks for doing this. I've got one concern though. I don't see any place where devcgroup_create() was updated to create the local exceptions list. I think we need a guarantee that at any time the local exceptions list will contain all the entries contained in the cgroup->exceptions list. Otherwise you cannot use the exception_add() the way you do (or you can't use RCU), since there could be a window between the successful addition of a rule to cgroup->local.exceptions and the failed addition to cgroup->exceptions, during which a task (since it won't need the mutex for devcg_allow()) could exceed allowed permissions. It's possible I'm misunderstanding. If you think that's the case just kick me and I'll take a fresh look. (Btw is there a git tree or gitweb view I could look at alongside the patchset?) thanks, -serge -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/