Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754913Ab2K2Upi (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:45:38 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:50270 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754646Ab2K2Upe (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:45:34 -0500 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:45:31 -0800 From: Kent Overstreet To: Andi Kleen Cc: Benjamin LaHaise , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, zab@redhat.com, jmoyer@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/25] Generic dynamic per cpu refcounting Message-ID: <20121129204531.GK15094@google.com> References: <1354121029-1376-23-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> <20121129185720.GE15094@google.com> <20121129185953.GW16230@one.firstfloor.org> <20121129191214.GG15094@google.com> <20121129192003.GX16230@one.firstfloor.org> <20121129192925.GH15094@google.com> <20121129193452.GI19042@kvack.org> <20121129202231.GJ15094@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1352 Lines: 27 On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:42:17PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > Kent Overstreet writes: > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 02:34:52PM -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:29:25AM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote: > >> > There's some kind of symmetry going on here, and if I'd been awake more > >> > in college I could probably say exactly why it works, but it does. > >> > >> I think the catch is that using only a 32 bit counter is something the > >> user could arbitrarily control the sum of all parts. I think a 64 bit > >> counter may be required to ensure no overflow occurs. Otherwise, an > >> overflow could result in a premature free when there are still 2^32 > >> objects active thanks to a malicious user (possible on systems with lots > >> of memory these days -- remote, but possible). > > > > That's no different from regular atomic_t - but you're right, we > > should be using size_t for anything userspace can manipulate. > > The regular atomic_t is limited in ways that you are not. > See my original mail. I don't follow, can you explain? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/