Message-ID: <1354226895.1700.12.camel@joe-AO722>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/23] printk: refactoring
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>,
        "Jan H." =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sch=F6nherr?= <schnhrr@cs.tu-berlin.de>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:08:15 -0800
In-Reply-To: <20121112152621.eb14d7f0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
References: <cover.1351135988.git.joe@perches.com>
	 <1351864140.3537.1.camel@joe-AO722> <1352760850.18715.8.camel@joe-AO722>
	 <20121112152621.eb14d7f0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1081
Lines: 36

On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 15:26 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:54:10 -0800
> Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 06:49 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 20:43 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > Make printk a bit more readable.
> > > 
> > > Andrew?  Are you going to apply this again for -next?
> > 
> > Andrew?  Any answer?
> 
> Backlogged, not lost.  Hopefully this week or next week.
> 
> I trust it has had more thorough compilation coverage testing
> than v1?

Well, it's getting to be too late for this series.

There are a few outstanding patches to printk that
should be queued before this restructuring is redone
for the next cycle.

Kay has some, Jan has some.

Likely those should go first.

When would be the best time to resubmit and get this
into -next?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/